Latest News

Factbox-U.S. Treasury tweaked its currency manipulation test; what’s different?

Economy19 minutes ago (Dec 03, 2021 17:18)

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Signage is seen at the United States Department of the Treasury headquarters in Washington, D.C., U.S., August 29, 2020. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly/File Photo

(Reuters) – The U.S. Treasury Department on Friday said it employed somewhat broader measures of trade and current account surpluses and currency interventions in its analysis of U.S. trading partners’ foreign exchange policies.

The semi-annual report declined to label any U.S. trading partner a currency manipulator, although it found that Vietnam and Taiwan continued to exceed its thresholds for possible currency manipulation and enhanced analysis under a 2015 U.S. trade law. Switzerland tripped two of the three new criteria but would have triggered all three under the previous standard.

Here’s how the new goalposts employed by Treasury compare with its past approach to the analysis, including a new measure for determining which countries qualify for review in the first place:


Under the old standard, the Treasury reviewed all trading partners with $40 billion total bilateral trade in goods – the sum of imports and exports – with the United States. Services were not included in the equation.

Under the new measure, services are added because of their increasing role in international trade, and Treasury dropped the $40 billion trigger and instead will look at the top 20 U.S. trading partners determined by this equation every six months.

For the 20 countries that qualify, Treasury employs three tests to determine if a country is a currency manipulator, reviewing each country to see if it has:

* A “significant” bilateral trade surplus with the United States

* A “material” current account surplus

* Engaged in “persistent, one-sided intervention” in foreign exchange markets

Also, Treasury will look at any trading partner that had triggered two of the three criteria in the immediately preceding report. This allows it to continue to pursue remedies, if needed, with any country that drops out of the top 20 from one report to the next.


Treasury now considers this threshold triggered if any of the countries under review had a goods and services trade surplus with the United States of $15 billion or more.

Previously the standard had been a $20 billion goods-only surplus.


Treasury’s revised approach on this question is the most complicated of the three and is designed to help it differentiate between current account surpluses that may be “excessive” in its view and those that could be considered “warranted.”

Previously countries with current account surpluses of at least 2% of their gross domestic product would count as having “material” surpluses.

Now Treasury looks at it two ways. The threshold is triggered for countries with current account surpluses of 3% or more of GDP or for those countries running surpluses that also have an estimated current account “gap” of 1% of GDP. A current account “gap” is a measure of how far a country’s actual current account balance deviates from Treasury’s estimated “optimal” balance.


The key change here is on Treasury’s measure of “persistence.” As before, net foreign exchange purchases of 2% of GDP qualify, but in order to be considered “persistent” they must now have occurred over eight of the 12 months in the review period versus six of 12 months previously.

The change is meant to help Treasury zero in on genuinely “asymmetric patterns” as opposed to those arising from external short-term shocks such as the ructions triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Factbox-U.S. Treasury tweaked its currency manipulation test; what’s different?

Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.

Biden Sees Gasoline Savings in Reach, China Still to Act

Previous article

AAR: November Rail Carloads Down Compared to 2019; Intermodal Up Slightly

Next article

You may also like


Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.

More in Latest News